Ways Of Male Musterbation

"Millennium Development Goals? Hope fades in a world increasingly unsupportive

As much as it is intended to evoke the spirit of what it meant ten years ago Summit hosted by United Nations released the Millennium Development Goals commendable would be unfortunate if we now meets in New York do the same feeling of satisfaction and confidence expressed then. Far, far away, are met for those who have been expecting and hoping for over a decade. With an eye toward 2015, date for compliance, are very few, if any, which harbor the illusion that the end will be a fairer world, where efforts to overcome hunger, extreme poverty, endemic diseases and the serious assaults on the environment will be set at levels that lead us to believe that, in fact, we are moving towards a more cohesive world, in which globalization is raised in its most sensitive.

There are many reasons that encourage Unfortunately, against this trend. If in times of economic prosperity, the achievements have been very limited (only minimal progress has been made in combating infant mortality and infectious diseases, while those achieved in primary education are null and poverty and hunger keep their thresholds disaster), no optimism spreads when this campaign is faced in times of crisis and the weakening of the will of global cooperation. official development assistance has dropped significantly - Spain has fallen by 800 million euros - as a result of restrictive policies against the debt by developed countries, while the conquest of 0.7% of GDP has been delayed by those who presumed to move in that direction without reservation. There are frequent unsettled voices of leaders in this regard.

However, in my opinion, this is not the worst. The expectations are complicated and obscure and n an international context where the cause of the crisis are over still, ultimately, the beneficiaries of it. firm position taken by the UN in this process - to replace Kofi Annan has revealed far - declines in time to the strengthening of forums, groups and agreements that bypass international law completely covered on the back of General Assembly or Organization World Trade , where all. But in the G-8 in the G-20 in Davos and in games of that ilk are not all or many fewer. Only a handful of countries and ranks first leaders to talk about anything but solidarity. There is nothing to regulate these organisms, but act as if they were repositories of most of the legal guarantees.

To our knowledge, none of them , lacking the legitimacy of the UN have emerged as sensitive in the commitment ten years ago, and even some of their good intentions have been simply a paper exercise. They spoke of reshaping capitalism to curb tax havens, to monitor speculative transactions to show, in short, who had learned the lesson that led to disaster in the summer of 2007. How have been such intentions? Has anyone heard of new discipline and supervision? It seems that the lead not already in the hands of sovereign states represented at the UN, but the ability to maneuver who, paradoxically, led to the mess that has brought us where we are.

Surprised, I read that Mr Zapatero, Prime Minister of Spain, after showing solicitous of the Moroccan sovereign, will star in "an economic offensive "New York. will not only General Assembly , as appropriate, but in a meeting with the cream of world finance. Nothing less than an encounter with the thirteen banks and investment funds that integrate the world's largest by volume of funds they manage. I have seen the relationship and is not called anyone the business world with productive vocation, creating wealth and employment, but conspicuous representatives of financial capitalism pure and simple. That is euphemistically known as "the markets." "investment brokers", to be precise, are also known. There are, among others, the CEOs of Citigroup, Prudential, Blackrock, Paulson & Co., Bridgewater Associates, Goldman Sachs, MetLife, the chairman of Soros and the director of public debt markets Tiia Cref. Look at the websites of these institutions and know what is good.

perhaps you will come to the same conclusion as I: seeking their attention, governments pay homage to those who not long ago was considered responsible for the crack that affects us, as today, however appear as victorious references to consult. is tremendous, that, using Summit you should self-critically reflecting on what has been done in these ten years with unmet goals, attention is polarized around what they do or intend to make the main architects of the problems facing the world, it does be a very disappointing and painful vision of what is happening. Well I doubt or recrimination has stern warnings to redirect on behaviors known.

It's just, I dare to venture, a manifestation of how in these times of rejection of the different emergency and xenophobia, at the same concentration outrageous wealth and start the public review, who rule the world with the support of their people cede sovereignty to those who understand the injustice and inequality in the world are inevitable.